Recently I bought a digital video camera and I have been taking it to public meetings, particularly to capture slides and presenter’s comments on same. Last night I was a bit shocked to be called out publically to not record a presentation. I had no problem complying but, of course, I became more interested in the presentation.
I tried to imagine what hands a recording could fall into and what foul deeds could be done. I was at a public venue open to anyone with $25 (Hispanic-Net June Meeting). No surprise, the presentation was by a lawyer and the subject was DRM (Digital Rights Management) issues. I don’t think I learned any secrets. One thing was very clear. Trying to track various rights claims on a property like a Hollywood film is unbelievably complex in the new world of today. And why is that? –Because it was designed for another era. So we are stuck with a phalanx of attorneys trying to preserve an image of the past that simply does not exist. –A very complicated mess. –A business at war with its customers. How out of touch can you get?
I think it is time for the messy part to end. DRM is a lawyer full-employment initiative. (Not that there no other such initiatives) The fat lady is singing. The lawyers are lined up adding more verses to be sung to extend the singing, but it needs to end. Some among the legal profession should tackle the challenge of revising the practice for what the new world has become. If some insist on old rules, they must be left behind. If some artistic work can only be heard on an original 78 rpm record, just leave it there. Put it in a museum. Lock it up and leave a couple of lawyers to guard it.
P.S. I mean no harm to the lawyer who in conscience had to ask me to hide my camera.